The World of Goo Boards 
        (http://www.musicfanclubs.org/cgi-bin/ggd/YaBB.cgi)
      

        Goo Goo Dolls >> Goo Goo Dolls >> Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
        
(Message started by: mchaps55 on Mar 2nd, 2006, 4:06pm)
Title: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by mchaps55 on Mar 2nd, 2006, 4:06pm
This is a follow up off the Billboard Blurb that was just posted in the forums.(sorry thought it deserved its own thread)  What i found in the article surprised me. Look down in bold.  Also at the very end it tells you when they are expected to be on the road.


http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002115046

Goo Goo Dolls Bring The 'Love' On Eighth Album


March 02, 2006, 3:20 PM ET

Jonathan Cohen, N.Y.
The Goo Goo Dolls' eighth studio album, "Let Love In," will arrive April 25 via Warner Bros. First single "Better Days" has been on the airwaves since the fall, having peaked at No. 3 on Billboard's Adult Top 40 chart and sold more than 250,000 digital downloads, according to Nielsen SoundScan.

As previously reported, the set was produced by Glen Ballard (Alanis Morissette, Dave Matthews Band). Among the tracks expected to make the final cut are "Give a Little Bit," "Feel the Silence," "Tuesday," "Strange Love," "Stay With You" and "I Can't Let Go."

"Let Love In" is the follow-up to 2002's "Gutterflower," which debuted at No. 4 on The Billboard 200 and has sold 682,000 copies in the United States.


The group will spend May through July on the road, but dates have yet to be announced.
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by mchaps55 on Mar 2nd, 2006, 4:06pm
"give a little bit" has to be a mistake or typo
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by sympathy_0 on Mar 2nd, 2006, 5:14pm
:nanner: :nanner: :nanner: :nanner: :nanner: :nanner::\O M G I AM SO EFFING PUMPED UP!!!!!!!!!! OMG FEEL THE SILENCE AND TUESDAY SOUND MOTHER ASS GOOD!!!!!!!!!!! I AM SO FUCKING HAPPY SERKLJFWLSDIJRNAOPXDITBUYOUIDFHY UXTZULDFCG7K6U BYS945TYITVUR8 7L.KJYCNU NMFE4VUG7B698YH XRDLKTB87 HFNVYTH  :nanner: :nanner:
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by nmf016 on Mar 2nd, 2006, 5:24pm
Okay... GALB better not be on the album.  I already have to skip over it on LIB, I don't want to have to skip it on LLI as well...

But 'yay' for new song titles.  I can't guess on Tuesday, but the rest all sound like 'John songs'.
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by Pon on Mar 2nd, 2006, 6:46pm
WOW! Gutterflower only sold around half a million? HAHA! This album is probably not gonna do as good...unless they release some dizzy like tunes, and i'm not sure about that cuz their music changed alot since.
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by DWG on Mar 2nd, 2006, 8:44pm

on 03/02/06 at 17:14:24, sympathy_0 wrote:
OMG FEEL THE SILENCE AND TUESDAY SOUND MOTHER ASS GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!


mother ass good?

that is some wild word association. :eyeroll:
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by mchaps55 on Mar 2nd, 2006, 8:50pm

Quote:
WOW! Gutterflower only sold around half a million? HAHA! This album is probably not gonna do as good...unless they release some dizzy like tunes, and i'm not sure about that cuz their music changed alot since.


Actually standards into today's music going gold isn't a bad thing. reason being with the price of cd's and file sharing selling 500,000 albums today is like selling over 2 million when file sharing wasn't in the picture. I meen look at a band like lifehouse with the huge hit they had(you and me) in 2005 along with it being the most played song on most stations and there alblum is only gold.(back in the 90's having a hit like that, the album would be triple platnuim) Music is alot diffrent these days and with "Better Days" and "Give a litte bit" doing so well over the past 2 years combined(radio play and digitial download), there is still a radio outlet and fanbase for this band. Digital download is a big thing in the market now of days, and makes the company a lot of money. Simply because they don't have to make 'records' online, so it's cheaper to make and they make more this way. They are still going still going strong, and I think even if this album only goo's gold the record company won't complain, you will still be hearing the songs on the radio and trust me it won't be a bad thing, The goo's are Sucking millions of dollars in for their company from mp3 sales of their previous records... The goo's are still very profitable and radio friendly.
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by TomAus1 on Mar 3rd, 2006, 6:49am
Ah man please tell me GALB wont be on the new album, that means only 9 new songs ?????
I hope this was an assumption made by the journalist however i have a feeling after this massive wait, there will be only 9 songs we havnt heard :'(
Sorry to be a bit down but man why put GALB on it???? it was recorded 2 years ago!!
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by sympathy_0 on Mar 3rd, 2006, 1:23pm

on 03/03/06 at 06:49:15, TomAus1 wrote:
Ah man please tell me GALB wont be on the new album, that means only 9 new songs ?????
I hope this was an assumption made by the journalist however i have a feeling after this massive wait, there will be only 9 songs we havnt heard :'(
Sorry to be a bit down but man why put GALB on it???? it was recorded 2 years ago!!


Because let's face it, it would boost sales. And GALB wasn't on a studio album..
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by tkc1989 on Mar 3rd, 2006, 5:15pm
honestly guys i think its nothing to be so worried about- it was prob a typo and meant to say better days.
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by sympathy_0 on Mar 3rd, 2006, 5:31pm
FYI make ur siggy better..>!!! LOL.
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by iris3732 on Mar 3rd, 2006, 8:53pm

on 03/02/06 at 16:06:00, mchaps55 wrote:
The group will spend May through July on the road, but dates have yet to be announced.


YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS.


on 03/02/06 at 16:06:00, mchaps55 wrote:
"I Can't Let Go."

Is it bad that I've made up a tune for this song and already have it stuck in my head?
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by Pon on Mar 3rd, 2006, 11:48pm
Going gold is not bad...it's good, but it's not a good sign if you went from multiplatinum to gold. It's like if a basketball player sits on the bench most of the time and scoring a few points...good, but if Michael Jordan did the same...not good.

I don't think filesharing is really an excuse cuz there are plenty of artists who are selling millions of albums.

The truth is is that dizzy was very attractive to a large audience and was a very good album, while gutter was not as good. I'm a huge fan of the GGDs, but I only liked 2 songs off of gutter and I often forget that they even released an album 4 years ago.

I would agree now about digital downloads, but not as much during gutter days.


on 03/02/06 at 20:50:33, mchaps55 wrote:
Actually standards into today's music going gold isn't a bad thing. reason being with the price of cd's and file sharing selling 500,000 albums today is like selling over 2 million when file sharing wasn't in the picture. I meen look at a band like lifehouse with the huge hit they had(you and me) in 2005 along with it being the most played song on most stations and there alblum is only gold.(back in the 90's having a hit like that, the album would be triple platnuim) Music is alot diffrent these days and with "Better Days" and "Give a litte bit" doing so well over the past 2 years combined(radio play and digitial download), there is still a radio outlet and fanbase for this band. Digital download is a big thing in the market now of days, and makes the company a lot of money. Simply because they don't have to make 'records' online, so it's cheaper to make and they make more this way. They are still going still going strong, and I think even if this album only goo's gold the record company won't complain, you will still be hearing the songs on the radio and trust me it won't be a bad thing, The goo's are Sucking millions of dollars in for their company from mp3 sales of their previous records... The goo's are still very profitable and radio friendly.
Title: Re: Let Love in-Song Titles inside(some)
Post by mchaps55 on Mar 4th, 2006, 12:09pm

Quote:
Going gold is not bad...it's good, but it's not a good sign if you went from multiplatinum to gold. It's like if a basketball player sits on the bench most of the time and scoring a few points...good, but if Michael Jordan did the same...not good.

I don't think filesharing is really an excuse cuz there are plenty of artists who are selling millions of albums. �

The truth is is that dizzy was very attractive to a large audience and was a very good album, while gutter was not as good. I'm a huge fan of the GGDs, but I only liked 2 songs off of gutter and I often forget that they even released an album 4 years ago.

I would agree now about digital downloads, but not as much during gutter days.



I hear ya but there are not nearly as many albums going platinum today as there was 10 yrs ago,5 yrs ago, hec even 2 yrs ago. �Selling Records is going down alot each year. �When Dizzy was out file sharing really wasn't around not like it is today by anymeens, I do agree that if Gutterflower was put out in the same time frame as Dizzy it wouldnt be as successful but it def would be Platinum. �Like i said before Lifehouse allbum is only gold, if that song game out say 95 and that album might be triple platinum. Just using that as an example


The World of Goo Boards » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.1!
YaBB � 2000-2003. All Rights Reserved.