The World of Goo Boards


    
      
        The World of Goo Boards 
        (http://www.musicfanclubs.org/cgi-bin/ggd/YaBB.cgi)
      

        Goo Goo Dolls >> Goo Goo Dolls >> These are seriously John pics??
        
(Message started by: babsil30 on Jun 3^rd, 2005, 1:30pm)

Title: These are seriously John pics??
Post by babsil30 on Jun 3^rd, 2005, 1:30pm

:thinkin: a friend of mine from bonjovi.com said that someone on "the calling" message board said these baby photos were of John Rzeznik.

HUH?? :thinkin: is it me or do you say :wtf: to the 2nd photo?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v298/live_4_music/melissa-4.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v298/live_4_music/melissa-3.jpg

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by FizzyGoo on Jun 3^rd, 2005, 1:43pm

1. The second picture looks like that baby is a girl, as she's wearing a ruffly dress.

2. John was a baby in the 60's. Photographs weren't that clear back then.

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by BeaTheGooFan on Jun 3^rd, 2005, 1:43pm

Hahahahah. I'm going to say that the pic is of one of the other Rzezniks....LOL most likely one of his sisters. �;D Or....he was wrong when he said in storytellers that he learned how to wear women's clothing on his own.....yeah I love that man!!! �:-*

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by PattyGoo on Jun 3^rd, 2005, 4:12pm

Nope, not his chin.

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by babsil30 on Jun 3^rd, 2005, 4:26pm

on 06/03/05 at 13:43:39, BeaTheGooFan wrote:

Or....he was wrong when he said in storytellers that he learned how to wear women's clothing on his own.....yeah I love that man!!! �:-*

:hahaha:

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by SassyMay on Jun 3^rd, 2005, 8:29pm

well the second might be him he said he used to look good in a dress and that's a cute baby!Just kidding!no but seriuosly i nearly passed out laughing when i saw the second pic!not becaus ethe baby looks weird but because your friend said those were johnny!
like you said bea they're prolly his sisiters...no wait that can't be because if johnny was a baby in the mid to late sixties and johnny is the youngest there's no way that could be one of his sisters because like fizzy said photos weren't that clear in the sixties. Do i sound like a total meany?i'm sorry! :-*

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by BeaTheGooFan on Jun 4^th, 2005, 1:21am

:D Sassy May, you're too funny! You're good with putting all the details together...you should request the tag line change from addicted to....hmmm �:thinkin:...detective sassy....yeah, if thread killer can do it, maybe you can too! �:hahaha: � �;)

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by SassyMay on Jun 4^th, 2005, 9:19am

thanx!i'm really sorry if i sounded to...well you know to detective like...lol!you crack me up!

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by Dances with Goo on Jun 4^th, 2005, 3:09pm

I think someone's pulling your leg, Babs...
Those pictures don't look like Rzeznik. I've seen a few on the net or stills on TV, and he has a different smile...and definately looked like a boy, not a girl.

Besides, that the baby in the second photo is wearing a very girly outfit, and the photo quality doesn't look like it was from the 60's like FizzyGoo said. Most of the 60's pics are black & white or if they are color, it's kinda funky like it was painted in.

And check out the toys. Those are not 60's-vintage toys at all. That thing where the kid lies there, batting at "Baby Cookie Monster"...no way that's a 60's toy.
Back in those days we were lucky if we got to play with a fake horse-head on a stick, or an empty cereal box. �:-[

I wanna go all CSI on those toys in that kid's playpen. Subject them to ~~carbon-dating~~...no...~~DNA-analysis~~...no...put 'em in the mass spectrophotometer to see if they're made of plastic instead of rubber...yeah, that's it. ::)

A bit of Sesame Street history for ya. The show didn't premeire until 1969 according to this link:

http://www.characterproducts.com/character_histories/sesame_st.htm

And that bizarre concept of Baby-Muppets didn't come out for years after that. No Baby Cookie-Monster, no Baby Grover, sorry.

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by Dream of Goo on Jun 4^th, 2005, 3:44pm

SESAME STREET lol. That reminds me when John and the guys got to meet Elmo hehehehe. Remember??? i've never seen the footage though but pics are funny.

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by BitterPills on Jun 4^th, 2005, 4:38pm

Patty's right, no cleft in chin, no John Rzeznik :thumbsup:

I've got a few pics of John young, while in school, and with his Dad, these baby pics don't resemble our Goo at all :mad:

You're born with that cleft, and let me tell you, even as a baby, it's always very visible - sometimes it does appear more so as you mature in age, but I truly don't see a resemblence in these photos at all :shakehead:

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by Skkyer on Jun 4^th, 2005, 9:52pm

You guys are right. Having been born in 57, and having helped raised my younger siblings, things for babies in the mid 60s where mostly nice shiney metal or wood. The only plastic I remember where the teething rings and the covering on the safety pins for those damn cotton diapers. I still have nightmares of helping to wash those darn things and hang them on the clothes line! :P

Title: Re: These are seriously John pics??
Post by babsil30 on Jun 5^th, 2005, 8:14am

i don't think my friend seriously thought these were JR in the photos! she was just s haring them telling me that people over at "the calling" message board were claiming the baby photos to be JR!

just how odd people would even think that the baby photos were JR... ESPECIALLY the one that is obviously a little girl! LOL