Author |
Topic: Name (New Version) (Read 845 times) |
|
sympathy_0
Goo God
Never you mind.
 
Posts: 2029
|
 |
Name (New Version)
« on: Nov 15th, 2007, 5:23pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
I LOVE THIS VERSION.
So good! I really like it.. What are everyone elses feelings on this?
Oh and FYI, MY BANNER IS UP! 
It matches the layout oddly well..
|
|
 IP Logged |
www.youtube.com/forbuss
|
|
|
Shannon
WOG Administrator
Gender: 
Posts: 6800
|
|
Re: Name (New Version)
« Reply #1 on: Nov 15th, 2007, 5:38pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I was listening to it yesterday. And, while I enjoy the more acoustic feel to it I feel it's lacking the passion the original has. Part of the reason I love this song so much is the guitar solo and guitar at the end. This version is missing what I love so much about the song. So I like the original better. It's more raw.
|
|
IP Logged |
If you need help, please email me at [email protected]
|
|
|
sympathy_0
Goo God
Never you mind.
Posts: 2029
|
|
Re: Name (New Version)
« Reply #2 on: Nov 15th, 2007, 5:39pm » |
Quote Modify
|
And the part at the end when John sings:
"I think about you all the time, I don't need to sing, It's lonely where you are come back down"
IS SO FREAKING AMAZING
|
|
IP Logged |
www.youtube.com/forbuss
|
|
|
nmf016
Thread Killer
Goo God
Slashephant
Posts: 3680
|
|
Re: Name (New Version)
« Reply #3 on: Nov 15th, 2007, 5:41pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I don't hate it. But in my opinion, it was completely unnecessary. If it ain't broke...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Shannon
WOG Administrator
Gender:
Posts: 6800
|
|
Re: Name (New Version)
« Reply #4 on: Nov 15th, 2007, 5:48pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I just listened to it again. I think the vocals are superb. But in my opinion the best version of this song is from LIB. You can't get any more raw than that. It's perfection.
This one feels a bit more polished than the original. I don't like that. And I hate that the finishing guitar is missing on this one.....you know....that final strumming? It's missing on this version and that just completes the song for me.
|
|
IP Logged |
If you need help, please email me at [email protected]
|
|
|
nmf016
Thread Killer
Goo God
Slashephant
Posts: 3680
|
|
Re: Name (New Version)
« Reply #5 on: Nov 15th, 2007, 7:16pm » |
Quote Modify
|
They were on joint WBR/Metal Blade for ABNG. I'll totally get behind the theory that they re-recorded Name to avoid fees, but the reason for LWD, Naked, etc missing is because they're not the 'greatest hits', which is defined by this album as the top 10 songs, not just whatever was released as a single.
And just for further discussion, it can't be that unaffordable to 'borrow' the original Name for this release. They didn't seem to have any problems putting Metal Blade songs on EOAC.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
sympathy_0
Goo God
Never you mind.
Posts: 2029
|
|
Re: Name (New Version)
« Reply #6 on: Nov 15th, 2007, 9:39pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I agree, it makes sense that they re did name to avoid the linscensing... Alas, they did not have trouble with EOAC. Hmm. Anywho, I really think the greatest hits CD is handy. I like having it
|
|
IP Logged |
www.youtube.com/forbuss
|
|
|
d.e.n.i.s.e.
Goo God
aka "the orange o"
Gender:
Posts: 1086
|
|
Re: Name (New Version)
« Reply #7 on: Nov 18th, 2007, 10:33pm » |
Quote Modify
|
It has to be annoying to pay fees to use your own song...big business getting in the way again.
|
| « Last Edit: Nov 18th, 2007, 10:34pm by d.e.n.i.s.e. » |
IP Logged |
[img][/img]
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Login![[MFC]](http://www.musicfanclubs.org/googoodolls/images3/tag_mfc.gif)
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print