Author |
Topic: These are seriously John pics?? (Read 1758 times) |
|
babsil30
Goo God
What's the point in all this screaming
 
 
Gender: 
Posts: 1747
|
 |
These are seriously John pics??
« on: Jun 3rd, 2005, 1:30pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
 a friend of mine from bonjovi.com said that someone on "the calling" message board said these baby photos were of John Rzeznik.
HUH?? is it me or do you say  to the 2nd photo?
|
|
 IP Logged |
I put my heavy coat on for a while
It's freezing in the corner of my mind
|
|
|
FizzyGoo
Goo God
"Wow...My Face is a Foot." -J. Rzeznik, 7.25.03
Gender:
Posts: 629
|
|
Re: These are seriously John pics??
« Reply #1 on: Jun 3rd, 2005, 1:43pm » |
Quote Modify
|
1. The second picture looks like that baby is a girl, as she's wearing a ruffly dress.
2. John was a baby in the 60's. Photographs weren't that clear back then.
|
|
IP Logged |
There are but two different kinds of people in this world: Those who love Goo, and those who are infinitely stupid.
|
|
|
BeaTheGooFan
Dizzy
LOL "...Sticky Colon..."
Gender:
Posts: 139
|
|
Re: These are seriously John pics??
« Reply #2 on: Jun 3rd, 2005, 1:43pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Hahahahah. I'm going to say that the pic is of one of the other Rzezniks....LOL most likely one of his sisters.  Or....he was wrong when he said in storytellers that he learned how to wear women's clothing on his own.....yeah I love that man!!! 
|
| « Last Edit: Jun 3rd, 2005, 1:44pm by BeaTheGooFan » |
IP Logged |
"It doesn't have to be this constant tragedy. We were doin' this VH1 Behind The Music thing and they tend to focus on the tragic elements of an artist's career. I was like, 'Dude, there's no tragedy here!'" -Johnny-
|
|
|
PattyGoo
Gooey Martini Bar-keeper
Goo God
Cosmoholic
Gender:
Posts: 3030
|
 |
Re: These are seriously John pics??
« Reply #3 on: Jun 3rd, 2005, 4:12pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Nope, not his chin.
|
|
IP Logged |
~Patty
|
|
|
babsil30
Goo God
What's the point in all this screaming
Gender:
Posts: 1747
|
|
Re: These are seriously John pics??
« Reply #4 on: Jun 3rd, 2005, 4:26pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jun 3rd, 2005, 1:43pm, BeaTheGooFan wrote:| Or....he was wrong when he said in storytellers that he learned how to wear women's clothing on his own.....yeah I love that man!!! |
|
|
|
IP Logged |
I put my heavy coat on for a while
It's freezing in the corner of my mind
|
|
|
SassyMay
Goo God
~Feb. 20, 1967-April 5, 1994 R.I.P.~
Gender:
Posts: 1367
|
|
Re: These are seriously John pics??
« Reply #5 on: Jun 3rd, 2005, 8:29pm » |
Quote Modify
|
well the second might be him he said he used to look good in a dress and that's a cute baby!Just kidding!no but seriuosly i nearly passed out laughing when i saw the second pic!not becaus ethe baby looks weird but because your friend said those were johnny!
like you said bea they're prolly his sisiters...no wait that can't be because if johnny was a baby in the mid to late sixties and johnny is the youngest there's no way that could be one of his sisters because like fizzy said photos weren't that clear in the sixties. Do i sound like a total meany?i'm sorry!
|
|
IP Logged |
myspace
http://www.myspace.com/sweetcharade0
Justice for Kurt
http://www.justiceforkurt.com
|
|
|
BeaTheGooFan
Dizzy
LOL "...Sticky Colon..."
Gender:
Posts: 139
|
|
Re: These are seriously John pics??
« Reply #6 on: Jun 4th, 2005, 1:21am » |
Quote Modify
|
Sassy May, you're too funny! You're good with putting all the details together...you should request the tag line change from addicted to....hmmm ...detective sassy....yeah, if thread killer can do it, maybe you can too! 
|
| « Last Edit: Jun 4th, 2005, 1:25am by BeaTheGooFan » |
IP Logged |
"It doesn't have to be this constant tragedy. We were doin' this VH1 Behind The Music thing and they tend to focus on the tragic elements of an artist's career. I was like, 'Dude, there's no tragedy here!'" -Johnny-
|
|
|
Dances with Goo
Guest
|
|
Re: These are seriously John pics??
« Reply #8 on: Jun 4th, 2005, 3:09pm » |
Quote Modify
 Remove
|
I think someone's pulling your leg, Babs...
Those pictures don't look like Rzeznik. I've seen a few on the net or stills on TV, and he has a different smile...and definately looked like a boy, not a girl.
Besides, that the baby in the second photo is wearing a very girly outfit, and the photo quality doesn't look like it was from the 60's like FizzyGoo said. Most of the 60's pics are black & white or if they are color, it's kinda funky like it was painted in.
And check out the toys. Those are not 60's-vintage toys at all. That thing where the kid lies there, batting at "Baby Cookie Monster"...no way that's a 60's toy.
Back in those days we were lucky if we got to play with a fake horse-head on a stick, or an empty cereal box. 
I wanna go all CSI on those toys in that kid's playpen. Subject them to carbon-dating...no...DNA-analysis...no...put 'em in the mass spectrophotometer to see if they're made of plastic instead of rubber...yeah, that's it. 
A bit of Sesame Street history for ya. The show didn't premeire until 1969 according to this link:
http://www.characterproducts.com/character_histories/sesame_st.htm
And that bizarre concept of Baby-Muppets didn't come out for years after that. No Baby Cookie-Monster, no Baby Grover, sorry.
|
| « Last Edit: Jun 4th, 2005, 3:25pm by Dances_with_Goo » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Dream of Goo
I'm Addicted
'DreamAway'
Gender:
Posts: 434
|
|
Re: These are seriously John pics??
« Reply #9 on: Jun 4th, 2005, 3:44pm » |
Quote Modify
|
SESAME STREET lol. That reminds me when John and the guys got to meet Elmo hehehehe. Remember i've never seen the footage though but pics are funny.
|
| « Last Edit: Jun 4th, 2005, 3:45pm by Dream of Goo » |
IP Logged |
"I'm trying to picture some little girl who's favorite bands are like the Goo Goo Dolls and Savage Garden or 'N Sync goin 'Aw, that Johnny is so cute. I'm going to buy all his early records,' and putting it on and then screaming and running to her parents."~ Robby Takac
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Login![[MFC]](http://www.musicfanclubs.org/googoodolls/images3/tag_mfc.gif)
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print